Between 2020 and 2025, average consumer goods prices rose by roughly 23% in the United States. Your mental price anchors probably didn't move nearly that far. That gap — between where prices actually are and where your memory thinks they are — is one of the biggest reasons players consistently undershoot in price guessing games.
Inflation is one of those economic forces that everyone experiences but nobody fully internalizes. You feel it at the grocery store. You notice it when you haven't rented a car in three years and suddenly it costs twice what you remember. But the way human price memory works, we don't make a clean update. We feel surprised, maybe annoyed, and then we continue carrying our old price schemas with a vague asterisk that says "things are more expensive now" — without actually updating the numbers.
Price memory is associative, not ledger-based. Your brain doesn't maintain a spreadsheet of current retail prices with automatic inflation adjustments. Instead, you remember the price you paid — or heard, or saw advertised — the last time you actively paid attention to a product. That memory forms an anchor. New encounters with the same product either confirm the anchor or create friction that eventually shifts it.
The problem is that friction itself is underweighted. When you see a product that costs more than you expected, the first instinct isn't "my anchor is wrong." It's "this is overpriced" or "maybe I should find a better deal." The anchor defends itself. It's easier to attribute a high price to gouging or poor value than to admit your mental reference is outdated.
Economic research on consumer price recall during inflationary periods consistently finds that shoppers' internal price estimates lag behind actual inflation by 12–18 months on average. After the pandemic-era supply chain disruptions, many categories saw that lag extend to two or three years — especially in durable goods, where purchase frequency is low and the opportunity to update your mental model is rare.
Not all categories inflated equally. Understanding which ones saw the biggest shifts helps you apply the right correction to your guesses.
There's no shortcut that replaces the habit of regular, attentive shopping. But there are targeted approaches that help faster.
For categories where you haven't made a purchase in two or more years, apply a 20–25% upward adjustment to whatever your gut says before guessing. This is a crude correction, but it's directionally right for most durable goods. A product you think costs $160 probably actually costs $190–$200 at current retail.
For food and household consumables — the categories where most people feel the sharpest day-to-day inflation anxiety — the adjustment is already somewhat baked in, because you've been buying these items regularly. Your grocery anchors are closer to current reality than your appliance anchors.
For luxury and premium goods, inflation is less relevant than category knowledge. Premium brands tend to raise prices independently of CPI movements, at their own pace and driven by demand elasticity rather than input costs. A Vitamix in 2026 costs more than a Vitamix in 2020 — but not primarily because of inflation. It costs more because the brand has successfully repositioned upmarket over time.
The net effect is predictable: players systematically underguess products in inflation-affected categories, and they've been doing it for long enough that the gap is substantial. The average player underestimates home appliances by approximately 22% and furniture by approximately 28%. These numbers closely track the cumulative inflation in those categories since 2020.
That's not a coincidence. It's a direct measurement of anchor lag. You're remembering 2020–2021 prices for products that now carry 2025–2026 price tags.
Daily play with a game like Price is Correct serves as a forced schema update mechanism. Each revealed price — especially on a product you guessed wrong — is an opportunity to push your anchor closer to current reality. Players with extended streaks tend to perform significantly better on inflation-affected categories than new players, because their anchors have been actively updated through feedback rather than left to drift.
The most reliable thing you can do in the near term: add 20% to whatever your instinct says on anything manufactured or furniture-related. You'll be wrong less often. And over time, the daily feedback will close the gap that inflation opened.
Find out today — and start closing the inflation gap one product at a time.
Play Today's Game →